Effect of the Intervention on Child Growth in a Randomized Controlled Trial of Eggs in Ecuador
| . | Baseline . | . | End Point . | . | Effect Size or PR . | Effect Size or PR . | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control (n = 82) . | Egg (n = 78) . | Control (n = 73) . | Egg (n = 75) . | Unadjusted . | Adjusteda . | |||
| Mean (SD) . | Mean (SD) . | Mean (SD) . | Mean (SD) . | β (95% CI) . | P . | β (95% CI) . | P . | |
| LAZ (SD) | −1.71 (0.92) | −2.09 (1.08) | −1.71 (1.00) | −1.39 (1.35) | .64 (0.40–0.89) | <.001 | .63 (0.38–0.88) | <.001 |
| WAZ (SD) | −0.40 (0.92) | −0.91 (1.24) | −0.55 (0.85) | −0.34 (1.06) | .71 (0.53–0.90) | <.001 | .61 (0.45–0.77) | <.001 |
| WLZ (SD) | 0.86 (0.99) | 0.55 (0.99) | 0.36 (0.81) | 0.45 (0.84) | .42 (0.20–0.65) | <.001 | .33 (0.14–0.51) | <.001 |
| BMIz (SD) | 0.80 (1.00) | 0.42 (1.10) | 0.64 (0.82) | 0.68 (0.86) | .45 (0.20–0.70) | <.001 | .29 (0.08–0.49) | .006 |
| % | % | % | % | PR (95% CI)b | P | PR (95% CI)b | P | |
| Stunted | 26 (32) | 37 (47) | 29 (40) | 21 (28) | 0.70 (0.44–1.12) | .14 | 0.53 (0.37–0.77) | .001 |
| Underweight | 4 (5) | 10 (13) | 5 (7) | 4 (5) | 0.78 (0.22–2.80) | .70 | 0.26 (0.10–0.70) | .008 |
| . | Baseline . | . | End Point . | . | Effect Size or PR . | Effect Size or PR . | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control (n = 82) . | Egg (n = 78) . | Control (n = 73) . | Egg (n = 75) . | Unadjusted . | Adjusteda . | |||
| Mean (SD) . | Mean (SD) . | Mean (SD) . | Mean (SD) . | β (95% CI) . | P . | β (95% CI) . | P . | |
| LAZ (SD) | −1.71 (0.92) | −2.09 (1.08) | −1.71 (1.00) | −1.39 (1.35) | .64 (0.40–0.89) | <.001 | .63 (0.38–0.88) | <.001 |
| WAZ (SD) | −0.40 (0.92) | −0.91 (1.24) | −0.55 (0.85) | −0.34 (1.06) | .71 (0.53–0.90) | <.001 | .61 (0.45–0.77) | <.001 |
| WLZ (SD) | 0.86 (0.99) | 0.55 (0.99) | 0.36 (0.81) | 0.45 (0.84) | .42 (0.20–0.65) | <.001 | .33 (0.14–0.51) | <.001 |
| BMIz (SD) | 0.80 (1.00) | 0.42 (1.10) | 0.64 (0.82) | 0.68 (0.86) | .45 (0.20–0.70) | <.001 | .29 (0.08–0.49) | .006 |
| % | % | % | % | PR (95% CI)b | P | PR (95% CI)b | P | |
| Stunted | 26 (32) | 37 (47) | 29 (40) | 21 (28) | 0.70 (0.44–1.12) | .14 | 0.53 (0.37–0.77) | .001 |
| Underweight | 4 (5) | 10 (13) | 5 (7) | 4 (5) | 0.78 (0.22–2.80) | .70 | 0.26 (0.10–0.70) | .008 |
Table shows results for end-point mean (SD) anthropometric measures and prevalence (no. [%], of undernutrition), as well as GLM modeling for unadjusted and adjusted effect size and PR for anthropometric outcomes, by group.
Adjusted for child age, sex of the child, and baseline anthropometry for the same dependent variable.
PR was estimated using GLM with robust Poisson.